Writing by Yvonne Watterson

~ considering the lilies & lessons from the field ©

Writing by Yvonne Watterson

Category Archives: Language matters

with all boldness

11 Monday Nov 2024

Posted by Editor in Anahorish, Anna Deavere Smith, Anna Deavere Smith, Anna Deavere Smith, Art, Awesome Women, Great Advice, Human Rights, Justice, Language matters, Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland Culture, Oprah Winfrey, Peace, Phoenix, Politics, Prop 300, Punishment, Seamus Heaney, The Peace Process, The Troubles, Theater

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna Deavere Smith, Gloria Steinem, Kamala Harris, Presidential Election 2024

On her afternoon talk show some years ago, Oprah Winfrey shared a list of eight powerful women she thought we should all know— as if we might encounter any of them at the grocery store or on the bus.  I remember one of them got my attention—Anna Deavere Smith, perhaps better known to some of you as Nancy McNally from the The West Wing, or as Gloria in Nurse Jackie. She told Oprah that woman should be bolder; that we should argue as much as our male counterparts, and that we shouldn’t try so hard to avoid conflict. We should speak up and out, she said. Boldly.

We should, and we do. At least two of us—the only two women ever nominated to be president by a major party—ran for President of the United States by doing so. They lost. Of course they lost. As post-election analyses continue to dissect the results with historians and pundits presenting their conclusions about why America overwhelmingly chose to elect Trump again, the fact remains that the United States is still bedeviled by misogyny.  If you don’t want to go that far, you’ll maybe look up and see that there’s only one crack in the ultimate glass ceiling.

Gender has always played a role in presidential politics, and the 2024 campaign was no exception. During the last one hundred odd days of it, we heard many of the same old story lines from the same old playbook that, according to Kristina Wilfore, co-founder #shepersisted  “undermine voter behavior toward women,”

Gendered disinformation is the spread of deceptive or inaccurate information and images against women political leaders, journalists, and female public figures. Following story lines that draw on misogyny, and gendered stereotypes, the goal of these attacks is to frame female politicians and government officials as inherently untrustworthy, unintelligent, unlikable, or uncontrollable – too emotional to hold office or participate in democratic politics. 

Vice President Harris chose to downplay her gender, her eyes fixed on a new era where it would be irrelevant in America. She rarely spoke about it or the historic nature of her candidacy as potentially the first Black woman to be elected president. Instead, she talked about the cost of groceries and prescription drugs and issues that should have galvanized the Democratic party—affordable housing,  protecting reproductive rights, bringing an end to gun violence, and strengthening the middle class. But it didn’t work, and too many Democrats chose to stay home on November 5th. Meanwhile, Trump and his allies chose to talk a whole lot about the Vice President’s  gender, to exploit it, with some of his allies branding her a “DEI candidate,”  “a childless cat lady,” “crazy,” “dumb as a rock.” One of them even likened her to a prostitute at a Madison Square Rally in the final stretch of the campaign.

She rose above it all. Was that a mistake? Maybe. Maybe she should have confronted him directly about his misogynistic remarks. Maybe during her one debate with him, she should have challenged him passionately on his overt sexism and his plans to put women back in their place, where he will protect us “whether we like it or not.” Maybe the more apathetic voters in those all-important swing states would have been more motivated to vote if they had seen Harris campaign harder on breaking the glass ceiling. Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered.

Sure. Women turned out for Harris. She won a higher share of white women with college degrees, but her opponent won an even wider margin with women who did not go to college. And, in 2024 there were more of them who voted. Add his gains with men in every age group, there was just no way for Harris to make up that ground, no path to victory.  In a nutshell, Trump won the working and middle classes, and Kamala Harris won over college-educated people who are financially better-off. Why? Maybe the prospect of electing a woman to the Oval Office is too much for the United States. 

Maybe not. Maybe misogyny wasn’t the deciding factor in Trump’s victory, but for many women it certainly feels like the “same old tired playbook” helped him win.  It will take some time to retire that particular playbook. The fight will take time, as Kamala Harris reminded us in her concession speech, but “That doesn’t mean we won’t win.”

It will take outrageous acts—lots of them.


An Outrageous Act

The week before Barack Obama won his second term, I met Gloria Steinem in Phoenix.  Following her remarks at a YWCA luncheon, she described a deal she has been making for years at the end of organizing events. To sustain momentum, she promised organizers that if, in the next 24 hours, they would do just one outrageous thing in the name of simple justice, that she would do the same. She told us it could be anything. Anything we wanted it to be. She also said that only we would know what it should be—pick it up yourself, run for office, suggest that everyone in the office say out loud how much they make thereby allowing everyone to know who is being discriminated against.

In return, Steinem guaranteed two outcomes. First, she guaranteed that after just one day, the world would be a better place, and secondly that we would have a good time. Never again would we wake up wondering if we would do an outrageous thing; rather, we would wake up and consider which outrageous thing we might do today, tomorrow, and the next day.

I’m not sure I did anything that even felt remotely bold or outrageous until I was in my forties. The principal of a small high school in Phoenix at the time, I was struggling to turn it around while dealing with the devastating impact of a new Arizona law, Proposition 300. It required me to inform 38 of my bright immigrant students that they would no longer be able to take state-funded college courses, because they were in the country without documentation. They had been brought to the US as infants by parents in pursuit of a better life for them, but without Social Security Numbers or visas, the American Dream would remain achingly elusive.

The irony wasn’t lost on me as an immigrant from Northern Ireland, being asked to segregate children at school—school which should be the sacred space in any country – placing those who could prove citizenship in college classes and denying those who could not prove residency and could certainly not afford to pay their own way. Over 90% of my students lived below the American poverty level. The law was unfair. It felt un-American and anti-immigrant. To be specific, it felt anti-Mexican immigrant. My white Northern European skin seemed much more acceptable. Who isn’t Irish on St. Patrick’s Day? Because nobody told me what to do or what not to do about my students, I decided to reach out to the local media and anyone who would listen. By my own standards, this was outrageous. Bold, I even asked for money. The kindness of strangers helped raised over $100,000 to pay for tuition. The world was a little better, the way Gloria Steinem would one day tell me it would be, and the story made it to the New York Times, “A Principal Sees Injustice and Picks a Fight with It.”

Of all people, Anna Deavere Smith read the New York Times on a morning in March 2008 during a trip to Phoenix. Later that day, during Spring parent-teacher conferences, Nancy from the West Wing arrived at my office. Initially star-struck, I wasn’t sure what to say to one of Oprah’s phenomenal women. But as she explained what she was doing in Phoenix, we fell into an easy conversation that covered a lot of ground—from Northern Ireland to Arizona. She was in town to interview, along with me, an array of politicians, community activists, lawyers, and incarcerated women, for her one-woman play, “The Arizona Project,” commissioned to honor the 2006 naming of Arizona State University’s law school for retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor—the first U.S. law school to be named for a woman. We talked about our respective childhoods, and Anna recalled that when she was a girl, her grandfather had told her that

 . . . if you say a word enough, it becomes you.

Walking in Other People’s Words

Inspired, Anna Deavere Smith traveled around the United States, interviewing people touched by some of our most harrowing social and racial tensions, recording her conversations with them, and shaping them into collections of monologues which she presents, verbatim, on stage. Using the real words of real people, Anna Deavere Smith breathes in – and out – America. It was surreal, sitting in my office talking to an acclaimed actress. She had “people”  who set up the camera in my office and left us to chat about justice and education and my beloved Seamus Heaney.

A fan of Heaney, she admired the picture of him hanging on my office wall. I made a copy of it for her,  and now that he’s gone, I like knowing his picture hangs in our respective living rooms.

Worlds apart but connected all the same. 

When our conversation ended, and the camera and tape recorder packed away, Anna Deavere Smith told her assistant to be sure to get a picture of the shoes. My shoes. They weren’t my favorites. They were uncomfortable. Beige, high-heeled and professional, chosen that morning I suppose in an effort to look a bit bolder at work, to be perceived as strong— a part of my armor.

It wasn’t until the night after President Obama was elected to his first term, when my students and I went to see Anna perform her one-woman show at the Herberger Theater that I understood the shoes.

Changing shoes between each of her monologues, Anna Deavere Smith walked for miles in our words, in our world. Boldly, she crisscrossed Arizona and America and showed us ourselves—how interconnected we are—prison system employees, incarcerated women, female lawyers, immigration activists and others including Justice O’Connor who was in the audience,  Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the Mayor of Phoenix, and the principal I was at the time. We were looking in the mirror, and much of what we saw was bleak. At the same time, with a brand new President elected the night before, there was hope in the air.

205142_1052722039427_2592_n

It’s time to get back at it, to look in the mirror, to take a walk in the shoes of other people—people with whom we vehemently disagree, people who appear to want something very different from the same place all Americans call home.  This is not the time to retreat or to recriminate. It’s a time for boldness, and I can think of no better voice to remind us than that of Seamus Heaney:

… make the world before you a better one by going into it with all boldness. You are up to it and you are fit for it; you deserve it and if you make your own best contribution, the world before you will become a bit more deserving of you.

Spread the word ...

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Instagram (Opens in new window) Instagram

Like this:

Like Loading...

after

11 Thursday Nov 2021

Posted by Editor in Breast Cancer Treatment, Cancer Language, Depression, Language matters, Memoir, Mental Health, Northern Ireland, Ordinary Things, World Mental Health Day 2013

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

American Cancer Society, Barrys Big Dipper, Birches, breast cancer treatment, cancer like a roller-coaster, Cancer-caused Depression, carnie, confronting mortality, Dana Jennings, depression, fatigue, hormones, identity, Learning to Fly, Northern Ireland, Portrush, power of stories, Prostate cancer, PTSD, Recovery, Robert Frost, taboo, Tom Petty, Words of Wisdom, Writing

You. Have. Cancer.

Like an unexpected snow, the pronouncement fell from her lips. I cried as though I had just found out that someone dear to me had died. Inconsolable at first, I assumed those great fat tears flowed from the sheer fright of a disease that has no cure. A decade later, I know my sorrow was more about wondering how to proceed toward the half-century mark without the woman I used to be. Oddly, nobody else seemed to notice she had vanished. Not even the person who delivered the news to me in much the same way as my mother might give me a ring to tell me that a childhood friend or a distant relative has died – reverent, hushed, kindly.

If I close my eyes, I can just discern the shadow of my former self standing up and walking out the door, offended by the nice Breast Cancer Navigator informing my husband and me that I had cancer. Me? With cancer?

She spoke in a quiet conspiratorial whisper, the way we quietly speculate about the cause of a death when all the evidence points to hard living. On and on she talked, as if trying to soothe us even as she filled our ears with fear. So many scary words.  Then with a brusque not-to-worry she stressed that what we were hearing that day in her dimly lit office was not a death sentence.

Not really.

Later, I would Google something by somebody who said cancer was a blessing that had bestowed her with the gift of two distinct lives – the one before cancer and the one forever changed by the diagnosis. She said the second life would be much better than the first. I cannot say life post-diagnosis has been or is better – it is just different.

For me and the woman I used to be, cancer became the scariest thing in my life, because, like every scary thing that actually happens, it had never crossed my mind. I still waste precious minutes fretting over things that most likely will never happen. But cancer did happen, and I remember wanting everyone to feel as sorry for me as I did for myself and howl about the unfairness of it all. I wanted a no-holds-barred pity party. I could not have predicted the impact of the let-down, placated by people I considered  friends who said I had nothing to worry about, my being so strong and someone to whom God would give only as much as I could handle and nothing more. I was told I should be thankful because I had the “good cancer.” I was on the pig’s back, beyond lucky to be the beneficiary of what they deemed a fine consolation prize, a veritable bonus – the boob job following the amputation of the right breast I wish I still had. I was even congratulated on still looking like myself – you’d never know you had cancer –  and five minutes later chided by someone who barely knew me when she found out I was not “doing chemo” as if it were something akin to laundry or a pile of dishes or sit-ups. There was the woman who told me to just get on with it and “put my big girl pants on,” with a nod to God because, you know, I could handle what He had given me. There were others who fled, afraid to utter the C word in my presence. I made excuses for them, guilty that I made them uncomfortable, showing up in the world every day, reminding them that cancer gets people like the person I used to be, people like them.

Thus a kind of dance with cancer – if I don’t mention it, they won’t mention it, and maybe it will go away. Or maybe it won’t, and then what? Will we swallow the words we are too scared to say and instead spit out cliches about doing battle and platitudes about the power of positive thinking? It’s trickier, I suspect, to ignore the recurrence of cancer, to feign indifference to it, once it has been roused from its slumber.

It’s difficult. All of it. For everyone involved.  In those weeks following diagnosis, I could have been kinder to those who showed up for me, even if they didn’t know what to say or do. They showed up. They held me up with  love – unconditional and fierce – my daughter, my late husband, my best friends, my family near and far. Consumed with fear and bitterness, I know I was hard to handle.  I know I didn’t thank them enough. My cancer changed their lives too.


Life is just less certain, following cancer. Often, I find myself holding my breath, a tiny bit afraid of what might be around the corner. The roller-coaster cliche still does the job. You know the refrain.

First, the arduous climb towards an intense blue sky, the anxious chatter and nervous giggling subsiding all around you. At the top, breath suspended, you wait for the world to fall out beneath you. Not yet. Next, a sudden plunge at shocking speed. Might you plummet to your death? Not yet. There are more unpredictable twists and turns to come, above and below. White-knuckled, clinging to the bar, you only half-believe there is enough life in the clickety-clacking, old machinery to set you back on solid ground. Suddenly it’s over. You are free to return to the midway, albeit a little green around the gills and unsteady on your feet. As he helps you out of the car, the weather-beaten carnie winks. Only he knows you aren’t as confident as you used to be.

Remembering my first time on The Big Dipper at Barry’s in Portrush, I close my eyes to better see myself once more hurtling through the North Atlantic air. Young and carefree, curls the color of a new penny wild in the wind, mouth agape, my eyes squeezed to block out light and noise and fear, I am half-hoping to stay aloft forever because ‘coming down is the hardest thing.’

Landing safely, startled to find myself somewhere between Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers “Learning to Fly” and Robert Frost’s lovely “Birches.” I’m back where I belong.

“I’d like to get away from earth awhile
And then come back to it and begin over.
May no fate willfully misunderstand me
And half grant what I wish and snatch me away
Not to return. Earth’s the right place for love:
I don’t know where it’s likely to go better.
I’d like to go by climbing a birch tree,
And climb black branches up a snow-white trunk
Toward heaven, till the tree could bear no more,
But dipped its top and set me down again.
That would be good both going and coming back.
One could do worse than be a swinger of birches.”

I don’t know where it’s likely to go better. 

I don’t know if the cancer will return. For now, there is no evidence of it. You see, no matter what they tell you, there’s no such thing as closure.  It’s a word I avoid and a concept I cannot consider without recalling the first time I realized how much it mattered to other people, in particular, a school principal who, following her observation of a lesson I had taught, indicated with grave disappointment, that I had provided “no closure” for my students. I didn’t bother arguing with her because I knew I would be back in my classroom the next day and the next – to continue – not to close – with my students.

Continuance – it has a nice ring to it.

Keep on keeping on.

Spread the word ...

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Instagram (Opens in new window) Instagram

Like this:

Like Loading...

The work of a November. . .

11 Monday Nov 2019

Posted by Editor in Act Two, Amputation, Breast Cancer Advocacy, Breast Cancer Treatment, Breast Reconstruction, Cancer Language, david bowie, Diagnosis, Glenn Frey, Language matters, Mastectomy, Memoir, Milestones

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Breast, Cancer, cancerversary, Deaths of David Bowie and Glenn Frey, DIEP Flap, dolores o'riordan, Lumpectomy, mastectomy, medical euphemisms, Memoir, Piestewa Peak, reconstruction, Sherman Alexie, sniglets, Surgery, Tom Petty

We end the set with what has become one of our songs. I make a joke about how I only sing in C. My love knows that’s not true, but he humors me because he knows I panic if he says it’s in A minor. Without saying it aloud, I remind him not to sing my verse. You know the one, the one about most Novembers and why they make me cry.  I’m possessive about “Goodbye,” Steve Earle’s “ninth step in the key of C” – a sober song for anyone who has ever been to hell  – and back – for anyone who is sorry for the harm they caused even when they don’t remember causing it; it is a song for November.

Video Player
http://www.yvonnewatterson.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/10000000_409031266411057_3344807500207654447_n.mp4

Media error: Format(s) not supported or source(s) not found

Download File: http://www.yvonnewatterson.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/10000000_409031266411057_3344807500207654447_n.mp4?_=1
00:00
00:00
00:00
Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.

Eight years ago, on a too-bright November morning, I was diagnosed with Stage II invasive breast cancer. I am loathe to declare the November date  a “cancerversary,” one of those cheery-sounding sniglets used to mark milestones in cancer country. The scars on this body that carries me from one moment to the next are daily and unavoidable reminders of that Halloween morning when I discovered the lump and the afternoon thereafter when an earnest young doctor, a stranger, delivered my diagnosis.  For cancer patients, there are plenty of these milestones – the date of a surgery undertaken to remove tumors or breasts or pieces of a lung; the completion of radiation or chemotherapy; the momentous day, five years after diagnosis, when a kindly oncologist will make the pronouncement of NED – No Evidence of Disease; and the day we dread most – discovery of metastasis.

Maybe it’s because there are no right words to respond to cancer, that we invent others to minimize and manage its havoc, to shelter us from it or make us smile through the illusion of it even as it terrifies us. And, make no mistake; we are terrified.

Me with Sherman Alexie

Filed away is an imperative from novelist, Sherman Alexie who once told an audience of writers that they “must share the scariest things about their lives.” Intrigued, I bought a ticket to hear him speak at the Heard Museum in Phoenix, bearing in mind advice he had given elsewhere: “Don’t lose the sense of awe you feel whenever you meet one of your favorite writers. However, don’t confuse any writer’s talent with his or her worth as a human being. Those two qualities are not necessarily related.” Accompanying me was my daughter, at the time a junior high student immersed in the words and drawings of Alexi’s Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. ALong with everyone else, we laughed conspiratorially as he shared what were surely the scariest things about his early years on the Spokane Indian Reserve.  Describing his father’s booze of choice,”Squodka” – a mix of Squirt soda and vodka – Alexie’s cheery nonchalance belied, I imagine, the anguish of a young boy confronting the reality of an alcoholic father who would disappear for days at a time. He knows, I know, that alcoholism on the rez  is no laughing matter.

Nor is cancer. It is a serious disease deserving of serious words, but we do a lousy job of talking about it in a way that conveys its reality or leads us to knowing what causes it or how to prevent it. So we rely on codes invented to keep this scariest of things at a safe distance. Code is acceptable in the cancer conversation and not just in the pink stuff of Breast Cancer Awareness Month – “save the boobies” fare.  “Mastectomy,” code for “amputation,” causes me to wonder if I were an amputee in the “traditional” sense, if I would ever refer to the day I lost a limb as my “ampuversary.” I think not.

The truth is that in the mythology of cancer, medical euphemisms abound. Myself, I have bandied about “lumpectomy” as though it is the thing we do to remove an inconsequential wart. In reality, it is a partial amputation. When I was first diagnosed, I presumed a lumpectomy was in the cards for me. As a word, it didn’t pack much of a punch, so it didn’t frighten me.  Then I met the surgeon who pointed out that my cancer was not amenable to lumpectomy given its proximity to the nipple and the fact that I was not endowed with large breasts.  Essentially, she didn’t have enough to work with; therefore, the surgery to remove my breast and reconstruct it would be trickier than the “simple” lumpectomy I had anticipated. As her meticulous notes would later confirm, “dissection was very difficult given the very small circumareolar incision used for the skin-sparing mastectomy.” It would require additional time and effort, not to mention skill and patience. So she recommended – and I nodded sagely as though I knew what she was talking about – a skin-sparing mastectomy which entailed removing only the skin of the nipple, areola, and the original biopsy scar to create an opening – a small opening – through which she would remove the breast tissue. Duly spared – spared, no less – the skin would then accommodate a reconstruction using my own tissue. Simple.

Perusing the details of my surgery, you would be forgiven for dismissing  the removal of a breast as painless. At times it sounds regal, befitting a fanfare of trumpets for that climactic moment when my breast tissue was “elevated off the pectoralis and delivered from the wound.”

While three surgeons operated on me, my then-alive husband and our girl waited in a waiting room where a set of paintings of the desert at dusk hung on the walls. It would have been about ten o’clock in the morning when my surgeon came out to find my weary, tiny family leaning on each other , waiting for the announcement she would later document, that “the frozen section was negative for metastatic disease.” There were no abnormal nodes and no further dissection was necessary.  Celebrating, she and my husband performed a silent high-five in the hospital hallway. Three hours later, having removed all the cancer she could see, she went about her day, leaving me in the capable hands of two highly sought after plastic surgeons, one being one of the best in Phoenix, the other a master of DIEP flap reconstruction, who had flown in the previous evening from Texas. When I eventually emerged from the ICU, high on Dilaudid, they say I told the young nurse on duty to pretend I was Madonna. Before I went home, she shampooed my hair.

In surgery, they worked on me for the next six hours, and two days later released me back to my life. Eight years later, I am told I look just like myself. You would never know, unless you asked to see, or I summoned the courage to show you, that I really don’t look like myself. Not my original self. Hidden under my clothes, is a trivial but nonetheless relocated belly button, its circumference now dotted with tiny white scars. Below it, a thin crooked scar, faded to white, stretches from hip to hip, with ‘dog-eared’ reminders on either end where JP drains pulled excess bloody fluid for several days after the surgery. I have a right breast too. Sort of. It is in the shape of a breast, impressively so, now that all the post-surgical swelling and discoloration has gone. Its skin is the same, spared by the mastectomy that removed its cancerous tissue through a very small incision around the areola also removed with its nipple.

As a rule, I tend not to dwell on the macabre, but I sometimes find myself obsessing about my old right breast, now a mastectomy specimen preserved in a container of formaldehyde solution. It weighed 294 grams, “the words expressly are ‘a pound of flesh.'”

Contemplating all that has happened in the past eight years – the cancer, the plunge into widowhood two Novembers later, the shift in priorities – I hear my mother say, in the parlance of home, that I have “come through the mill.” Lest I wallow too much, somebody will always be there to point out that things could be worse.

One evening, shortly after the death of my husband, I bumped into a former colleague. He hadn’t seen me for a few years but had still kept up with my professional exploits. Standing in the produce department at Safeway, he tendered his condolences and then wondered aloud if I had ever read Joan Didion’s Year of Magical Thinking. Of course I have. Several times. I know great chunks of it by heart.  It is an exquisite study of loss that blows open my heart. And then he said to me, “Well, at least your daughter didn’t die.”

At least your daughter didn’t die. 

The sentence hung in the space between us for too long. I don’t remember what I said. Something perhaps. Probably nothing. I know I scrambled internally to excuse him as someone who had never lost anyone that mattered much to him. I know I also hated him.

At least your daughter didn’t die.  

No. She is right here. Just 21 years old and beautiful, tough without being hard, unmoored without the man who was her first word and who took her for ice cream to a Dairy Queen, since demolished, on Fridays after school. She learned to drive his Jeep without him and she strode across the stage to receive her high school diploma without his cheers ringing in her ears. He would have liked that they used the Talking Heads for the graduation processional – “This Must Be the Place.” He would have tapped his feet and winked at me and brushed away a tear, because by then, he would have grown sentimental – all the more if he’d had any inkling of the milestones on her horizon. She would earn her first paycheck without the ready winks and smiles that had always encouraged her to keep being great at being herself regardless of the bullshit that comes with a part-time job in retail. In spite of her trouble with math, she is navigating her way through the degree program that will allow her to one day work with teenagers who are lost without their parents.  She is lovely, reminding me sometimes of the kind of bird that only flies in a faraway place.  Exotic. Rare. Endangered.

On one of the anniversaries of his death that November morning when we were far from our home, she told me it was beyond her grasp that one day it would be ten years, twenty years, forty years, since her dad last held her hand in the frozen food section of the grocery store – to keep her warm.

At least my daughter didn’t die.

I still don’t have the words to hand to the man who asked me about Joan Didion’s book. I wanted to tell him I couldn’t remember if I’d said Goodbye to my husband, if he’d heard me say it before my cellphone died the way it always does because I never remember to charge it.  I wanted to tell him the last conversation our little family had was a transatlantic phone call – my daughter and I on top of the Titanic museum in a foggy Belfast, my husband in our Phoenix living room, all of us unaware it would be the last time we talked and laughed together.  I didn’t. Instead, I reminded myself of  Lou Reed reminding me of magic and loss and of Sherman Alexie lighting up the Heard Museum with a coping strategy for those times when we despair at the lack of compassion in the world. Remember, he had said, “the world gave us Hitler – but it also gave us Springsteen.”

The world gave us Bruce Springsteen.

And Prince. And Dolores O’Riordan. And Tom Petty. And Donald Trump.  And Steve Earle, sorry for all the lonely nights he put her through, for not remembering if he said goodbye. And all the people who say the wrong thing at the wrong time. We just have to find the sweet spot in which to live and die.

Magical thinking . . .

How shall I mark this day?

I will climb again to the summit of Piestewa Peak in the Phoenix Mountain Preserve. It has been almost a year since I stood there, arms akimbo, high up and far away. I have missed it up there, looking down and romanticizing the sprawl glittering below me. I think I’ll go back and wonder the way I do up there about Wordsworth when he first stopped to consider the view. It’s ’emotion recollected in tranquility. ‘ It’s just an illusion.

Composed upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802

Earth has not anything to show more fair:
Dull would he be of soul who could pass by
A sight so touching in its majesty;
This City now doth, like a garment, wear
The beauty of the morning; silent, bare,
Ships, towers, domes, theatres, and temples lie
Open unto the fields, and to the sky;
All bright and glittering in the smokeless air.
Never did sun more beautifully steep
In his first splendour, valley, rock, or hill;
Ne’er saw I, never felt, a calm so deep!
The river glideth at his own sweet will:
Dear God! the very houses seem asleep;
And all that mighty heart is lying still!

IMG_1765

Spread the word ...

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Instagram (Opens in new window) Instagram

Like this:

Like Loading...

spare me the cancer celebration – a reprise

20 Saturday Jan 2018

Posted by Editor in Act Two, Amputation, Breast Cancer Advocacy, Breast Cancer Treatment, Breast Reconstruction, Cancer Language, david bowie, Diagnosis, Glenn Frey, Language matters, Mastectomy, Memoir, Milestones

≈ 22 Comments

Tags

Breast, Cancer, cancerversary, Deaths of David Bowie and Glenn Frey, DIEP Flap, dolores o'riordan, Lumpectomy, mastectomy, medical euphemisms, Memoir, Piestewa Peak, reconstruction, Sherman Alexie, sniglets, Surgery, Tom Petty

Profoundly saddened by the recent death of Dolores O’Riordan and news that Tom Petty died of an accidental overdose, I barely looked at the clock yesterday, the way I have done for the past six years, on January 19th.  I am loath to declare the date I underwent the mastectomy and reconstruction of my right breast, a “cancerversary,” one of those cheery-sounding sniglets often used to mark milestones for those ensnared within the disease. There are too many milestones – the day a lump is discovered or a diagnosis delivered; the date of a surgery undertaken to remove tumors or breasts or pieces of a lung; the day, five years after diagnosis, when an oncologist makes a pronouncement of NED – No Evidence of Disease.

Maybe it’s because we don’t have the right words to respond to cancer, that we make up other words – to minimize and manage its havoc, to shelter us from it, to make us smile through it even as it terrifies us. We are terrified.

me with Sherman Alexie

Sherman Alexie. says that writers must write about the scariest things in their lives. Intrigued by this advice, I bought a ticket to hear him speak one evening at the Heard Museum in Phoenix. Accompanying me was my daughter, in Junior High at the time and immersed in his Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. Along with everyone else, we laughed as he shared what were surely the scariest things about his early years on the Spokane Indian Reserve.  His laughter as he described his father’s beverage of choice,”Squodka” – a mix of Squirt soda and vodka – belied, I imagine, the anguish of a young boy confronting the reality of an alcoholic father who would disappear for days at a time. I know Sherman Alexie knows that  alcoholism on the rez  is no laughing matter.

Nor is cancer. It is a serious disease deserving of serious words, but we do a lousy job of talking about it in a way that confronts its reality or that leads us to knowing its cause or how to prevent it. We speak in codes that keep this scariest of things at a safe distance. Code is acceptable in the cancer conversation and not just in the pink stuff of Breast Cancer Awareness Month – “save the boobies” fare. Codes. “Mastectomy,” for example,  is code for “amputation.”  It makes me wonder. Were I an amputee in the “traditional” sense, would I refer to the day I lost a limb as my “ampuversary”? No. I would not.  Medical euphemisms abound. I used to toss around “lumpectomy” as though it were the removal of an inconsequential wart, instead of what it really is – a partial amputation. When I was first diagnosed, I presumed a lumpectomy was in the cards for me. As a word, it didn’t pack much of a punch, so it didn’t frighten me. Then I met my surgeon who pointed out that my cancer was not amenable to lumpectomy given its proximity to the nipple and the fact that I was not endowed with large breasts.  Essentially, she didn’t have enough to work with; therefore, the surgery to remove my breast and reconstruct it would be trickier than the “simple” lumpectomy I had anticipated. As her meticulous notes would later confirm, “dissection was very difficult given the very small circumareolar incision used for the skin-sparing mastectomy.” It would require additional time and effort, not to mention skill and patience. So she recommended (and I nodded sagely in agreement as though I knew what she was talking about) a skin-sparing mastectomy which entailed removing only the skin of the nipple, areola, and the original biopsy scar to create an opening – a small opening – through which she would remove the breast tissue. Duly spared – spared, no less – the skin would then accommodate a reconstruction using my own tissue. Simple.

Reading through the details of my surgery, you would never know that cancer and its treatment is ugly or that it hurts. At times it sounds downright regal, befitting a fanfare of trumpets, especially that climactic moment when my breast tissue was “elevated off the pectoralis and delivered from the wound.”

While three surgeons operated on me, my weary husband waited, leaning on our daughter, she on him. It would have been about ten o’clock in the morning when my surgeon came out to announce to them what she would later write, that “the frozen section was negative for metastatic disease,” that there were no abnormal nodes, that no further dissection would be needed. She and my husband performed a silent high-five in the hospital hallway. And, after three hours, she had removed all the cancer she could see and could go about her day, leaving me in the capable hands of two highly sought after plastic surgeons, one being one of the best in Phoenix, the other a master of DIEP flap reconstruction, who had flown in the previous evening from Texas.

They worked on me for the next six hours, and a day later released me back to my life. Six years later, I am told I look just like myself. You would never know, unless you asked to see, or I summoned the courage to show you, that I really don’t look like myself. Not my original self. Hidden under my clothes, since the DIEP flap reconstruction, is a trivial but nonetheless relocated belly button, its circumference now dotted with tiny white scars. Below it, a thin scar, faded to white, stretching from hip to hip, with ‘dog-eared’ reminders on either end where JP drains pulled excess bloody fluid for days after the surgery. I have a right breast too. Sort of. It is in the shape of a breast, impressively so, now that all the post-surgical swelling and discoloration has gone. Its skin is the same, spared by the mastectomy that removed its cancerous tissue through a very small incision around the areola also removed with its nipple.

I tend not to dwell in the macabre, but I cannot help wonder about my old right breast, now a mastectomy specimen preserved in a container of formaldehyde solution. It weighed 294 grams, “the words expressly are ‘a pound of flesh.'”

Contemplating all that has happened in the past six years – the cancer, the death of my daughter’s daddy, the shift in priorities – I suppose you could say what they say in Northern Ireland. “God love her, she’s come through the mill.” Lest I wallow too much, however, there is always the reminder that I could be worse off.

I recall encountering someone I hadn’t seen for a few years, and he asked me if I had read Joan Didion’s Year of Magical Thinking. Yes. Indeed I have. Several times. I know great chunks of it by heart.  And then he said, “Well, at least your daughter didn’t die.”

At least your daughter didn’t die. 

No. She didn’t. She is right here. She is 20 years old now and beautiful. She is tough without being hard. She is vulnerable without the man who was her first word and who bought her ice-cream every Friday afternoon. She learned to drive without him and walked across the stage to receive her high school diploma without his cheers ringing in her ears. She earned her first paycheck without the winks and smiles that encouraged her to keep being great at at being herself. She completed her Associate’s Degree and is off to complete a degree in Psychology, so she can one day work with young people who have lost parents.  Sometimes my lovely girl reminds me of a beautiful bird.  Exotic. Rare. Endangered.

On the anniversary of his death, she told me it was beyond her grasp that two years had passed and that one day it would be ten years, twenty years, forty years, since her dad last held her hand in the frozen food section of the grocery store. To keep her warm.

At least my daughter didn’t die.

So I didn’t know what to say to the person who asked me about Joan Didion and therefore said nothing. I should know but still don’t that when people show you who they are, believe them.  Instead I reminded myself of  Lou Reed’s reminder of magic and loss and of Sherman Alexie who told us that night in the Heard Museum that when we despair at the lack of compassion in the world, we might remember that the world gave us Hitler – but it also gave us Springsteen.

The world gave us Bruce Springsteen.

And Dolores O’Riordan. And Tom Petty. And, yes, the world also gave us Donald Trump.  And all the people who say the wrong thing at the wrong time. And somehow we have to find the sweet spot in which to live and die.

Magical thinking . . .

So what will I do to mark the day?

A day late, I may just climb again to the summit of Piestewa Peak in the Phoenix Mountain Preserve. It has been over a year since I sat at the top, and I have missed it. Up there, I will survey the valley below. And, glad to be so high up and far away from where I lay eight years ago, I will weep.

I will weep.

IMG_1765

Spread the word ...

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Instagram (Opens in new window) Instagram

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Bronze Winner – Best of the Diaspora. 2018 Blog Awards Ireland.

Bronze Winner: 2017 Blog Awards Ireland

Finalist. 2016 Best Blog of the Irish Diaspora

Longlisted. 2015 Blog Awards Ireland

Finalist: 2014 Blog Awards Ireland – Best Blog of Irish Diaspora

SHORTLISTED: 2013 BEST BLOG OF THE IRISH DIASPORA

Consider the lilies with me

Enter your email address & I'll send free updates from my blog.

Field Notes

  • a place for everything & everything in its place …
  • exhaust the little moment
  • a more onerous citizenship: biden

Since the Beginning

E-Mail

ycwatterson@gmail.com

Yvonne writes a fortnightly column for her hometown newspaper, The Antrim Guardian

More places to visit . . .

  • A Fresh Chapter
  • Gloria Steinem
  • http://google-site-verification:googlefe0a82c25e4f86ee.html
  • http://google-site-verification:googlefe0a82c25e4f86ee.html
  • IrishCentral.com
  • Journeying Beyond Breast Cancer
  • Maria Popova's Brainpickings
  • Maria Popova's Literary Jukebox
  • Standing Naked at a Bus Stop
  • The Accidental Amazon
  • The Pink Underbelly
  • The Womens International Perspective

Copyright & Other Things to Know

© yvonnewatterson.com Writing by Yvonne Watterson and Yvonne Watterson and Time to Consider the Lilies & Lessons from the Field, (Considering LIlies & Lessons from the Field) 2011-2020. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and owner is strictly prohibited. Unless otherwise attributed, all blog contents and original images are created by and are the sole property of Yvonne Watterson, author, photographer, and blog administrator. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Yvonne Watterson and Time to Consider the Lilies & Lessons from the Field with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Writing by Yvonne Watterson participates in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn commissions by linking to Amazon. This means that when you buy a book on Amazon from a link provided on this site, I receive a small percentage of its price.

The Lilies at Rideau Hall, Ottawa, Canada ~ photograph by Ken Kaminesky .

take time to consider the lilies every day . . .

More places to visit . . .

  • A Fresh Chapter
  • Gloria Steinem
  • http://google-site-verification:googlefe0a82c25e4f86ee.html
  • http://google-site-verification:googlefe0a82c25e4f86ee.html
  • IrishCentral.com
  • Journeying Beyond Breast Cancer
  • Maria Popova's Brainpickings
  • Maria Popova's Literary Jukebox
  • Standing Naked at a Bus Stop
  • The Accidental Amazon
  • The Pink Underbelly
  • The Womens International Perspective
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Immigration matters

From there to here . . .

Yvonne hails from Antrim, Northern Ireland, and has lived in the desert southwest of the United States for almost thirty years. Married, with a daughter who is navigating her path through the "teen tunnel," and a haughty cat, Atticus, she has spent the better part of the last three decades in the classroom as a student, teacher, and administrator. Her mid-life crisis came as a sneaky Stage II invasive breast cancer diagnosis which subsequently sent her to the blogosphere where she found a virtual home away from home . . .
Empowered Blogger
Featured on BlogHer.com

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d